What is the problem with a solar system model of the atom?
Answers: The major thing is that the electron isn;t ably behaved similar to a planet. It can appear anywhere in 3 dimensions contained by a region around the nucleus. (more like a bee around a hive consequently a planet around the sun) Plus, the electron is actually fluttering surrounded by and out of existance i that region in a markedly non planet (non-bee) like comportment. It can hop out of existance in one place and appear surrounded by another. It can behave like a bit or like a whirl. Weird stuff.
more then one electron circles the solar system model so it will cancle out more protons cause the atom to atomicly change to a different factor
Electrons can best be represented as shells, not circles, around the nucleus of the atom. And several electrons can share a shell, whereas planets can't share orbits.
The solar system is represented as flat or disc similar to.
Atoms don't circumvent around the equator of the nucleus. They don't have an equator. So it would not be a replica.
The crucial problem is that electrons have an electrical charge and an orbit body is constantly accelerating (remember that acceleration includes alter in direction, not a moment ago change contained by speed). Any accelerating charged molecule will radiate energy and within so doing slow down. So an orbiting electron would efficiently spiral into the nucleus. By quickly I be going to in a fraction of a second.
You cannot make clear to exactly where an electron is at a given moment or where on earth it is going. You can calculate the probability that an electron will be found contained by a given volume of space, but that isn't the same as knowing where on earth that electron is.
Well, the solar system has extra terrestrials..and so far science have shown that they don't exist at the quantum level..I'm sure of this.
Electrons don't move within circular orbits (I know planets orbit within elipses, but the explanation works). Electrons move in a flounder that curves around the nucleus.
Also, electrons pair up surrounded by their shells. Planets don't pair up beside other planets. Also, most shells (all, except for the s shell) have more than 2 electrons. Planets hold discrete orbits near no other planets in equal orbit.
The dynamics of an atom are described best using quantum theory. That is because motions and change of position occur contained by discrete steps.The solar system can be described by Newtonian physics, i.e., motions and changes of positions are smooth and continuous.
In the atom, you may know the position of an electron or its' momentum, not both at impossible to tell apart time (Heisenberg uncertainty principle ).
And the position of an electron is probabilistic.
In the solar system adjectives planets can actually be see, and their position and momentum measured at any time, simultaneously.
More Solar Questions & Answers...
What size (how various watts) solar system do I involve if I use 800kwh a month?
Need relieve beside solar pannel?
Are human beings the major species of the universe, or do other solar systems hold animal kingdom's to themself
Answers: The major thing is that the electron isn;t ably behaved similar to a planet. It can appear anywhere in 3 dimensions contained by a region around the nucleus. (more like a bee around a hive consequently a planet around the sun) Plus, the electron is actually fluttering surrounded by and out of existance i that region in a markedly non planet (non-bee) like comportment. It can hop out of existance in one place and appear surrounded by another. It can behave like a bit or like a whirl. Weird stuff.
more then one electron circles the solar system model so it will cancle out more protons cause the atom to atomicly change to a different factor
Electrons can best be represented as shells, not circles, around the nucleus of the atom. And several electrons can share a shell, whereas planets can't share orbits.
The solar system is represented as flat or disc similar to.
Atoms don't circumvent around the equator of the nucleus. They don't have an equator. So it would not be a replica.
The crucial problem is that electrons have an electrical charge and an orbit body is constantly accelerating (remember that acceleration includes alter in direction, not a moment ago change contained by speed). Any accelerating charged molecule will radiate energy and within so doing slow down. So an orbiting electron would efficiently spiral into the nucleus. By quickly I be going to in a fraction of a second.
You cannot make clear to exactly where an electron is at a given moment or where on earth it is going. You can calculate the probability that an electron will be found contained by a given volume of space, but that isn't the same as knowing where on earth that electron is.
Well, the solar system has extra terrestrials..and so far science have shown that they don't exist at the quantum level..I'm sure of this.
Electrons don't move within circular orbits (I know planets orbit within elipses, but the explanation works). Electrons move in a flounder that curves around the nucleus.
Also, electrons pair up surrounded by their shells. Planets don't pair up beside other planets. Also, most shells (all, except for the s shell) have more than 2 electrons. Planets hold discrete orbits near no other planets in equal orbit.
The dynamics of an atom are described best using quantum theory. That is because motions and change of position occur contained by discrete steps.The solar system can be described by Newtonian physics, i.e., motions and changes of positions are smooth and continuous.
In the atom, you may know the position of an electron or its' momentum, not both at impossible to tell apart time (Heisenberg uncertainty principle ).
And the position of an electron is probabilistic.
In the solar system adjectives planets can actually be see, and their position and momentum measured at any time, simultaneously.
More Solar Questions & Answers...